Maldives Takes On The Climate Challenge
On March 17th, at the launch of the British film ‘The Age of Stupid’, President of the Maldives, Mohammed Nasheed, proved a point to the world.
He unveiled a plan to make his country go carbon neutral within ten years. Ambitious as it is, this will make Maldives the first country in the world to go carbon neutral.
“If we can achieve this – a small, relatively poor country – there can be no excuse from the rich industrial nations who claim that going green is too complex, too expensive, or too much of a bother”.
“Survival is non-negotiable”
With climate change and rising sea levels, the long-term habitability and existence of the Maldives is threatened. The 200-odd inhabited islands of the Maldives are all barely 1.5 metres above sea level. Climate change is no far-fetched threat to the people of this country, but a question of survival. For these people, life atop their coral atolls is expected to be obliterated by 2100, by which time sea levels will rise more than 1.5 metres. But rather than taking the easy way out and booking a safe landing in another nation (an option that was tried and scrapped for financial reasons), Maldives is choosing the harder option of tackling climate change head on.
Here is the way
Close to one month ago, the Maldives government approached authors Matk Lynas (‘Six Degrees’) and Chris Goodall (‘Ten Technologies to Save the Planet’), for a plan to make the country go carbon neutral, and eliminate fossil fuel use by 2020. The plan is ambitious, and estimated to cost $1.1 billion over ten years, more than the country can currently afford. The economy based almost entirely on tourism and fishing, is worth about $800 million a year. But the scheme should pay for itself fairly quickly, because of the savings on oil imports, says Lynas.
Notwithstanding the cost, the Maldives aims to go through with the plan, and switch completely to renewable energy sources, for electricity, transport and cooking requirements.
Close to 155 wind turbines and a solar panel ‘field’ will provide the bulk of the electricity. To account for any variability or shortfall, they propose biomass combustion using coconut husks for the capital, and batteries for the other islands. Currently, the major source of energy for most islands is diesel generators. As for transport, the plan suggests switching from diesel and petrol to electricity generated from renewables. Cooking is mainly done through wood and kerosene, which will likely be replaced by alternatives such as solar cookers, electric stoves and efficient closed stoves. Composting organic waste will eliminate methane generation, and the resulting material will be used to improve soil fertility and crop-yields.
50,000 tourists carbon neutrality?
The one major shortfall of the plan is the issue of countering the effects of tourism. The country’s economy is heavily dependent on tourism, with 50,000 tourists visiting the Maldives each year. After electricity, the largest source of carbon emissions is aviation. The authors of the plan propose to counter this by carbon offsetting,using the EU – Emission Trading Scheme.
On a mission to prove a point
The Maldives is not the first country to announce its plan to go carbon neutral – Norway is aiming for the same by 2030. But this scheme is more ambitious, not only in its ten year target, but also in its approach. It aims to ‘diffuse the carbon bomb’ and decarbonise the economy completely – unlike Norway, which will still rely on emission offsets.
No one is suggesting that the path to carbon neutrality will be easy. But “The point of doing it”, says Lynas, “is that this is something the Maldives can lead the world in”.
|
Last chance to change The announcement from the Maldives government came just days after the meeting of the International Scientific Congress on Climate Change. The conference came out with key findings including:
Surely this is a mountain-sized-hint that the world must take. If the Copenhagen conference in December this year fails, the fault will lie with all countries in the world that lack the spunk to ‘be the change’. |
Now the world has an opportunity to come together and prevent a looming environmental catastrophe. That opportunity is Copenhagen. Copenhagen can be one of two things: It can be an historic event where the world unites against carbon pollution Or it can be a suicide pact” Mohammed Nasheed |
Library
| SPOTLIGHT
CLIMATE NEWS SUSTAINABLE INDIA |
CLIMATE BLOG
|
WHY NEW COAL
Each week, we will profile a Climate Challenge India member, and keep you up to date on how they are engaging with climate change. Our first member of the week is the ‘Why New Coal’ Campaign.

|
‘Why New Coal’, is a campaign started by Switch ON, an Indian grassroot climate action project which aims at spreading the urgency of the message, and inspires leadership for action on climate change. ‘Why New Coal began as an initiative to raise awareness and promote action towards a sustainable energy future. This campaign questions India’s over reliance on fossil fuels, and asks why new coal fired power plants are in the pipeline, when renewable alternatives exist. India is home to 17% of the world’s population, and accounts for 3.5% of the world’s energy consumption. The country currently generates about 700 billion kWh of electricity, but this caters only to one thirds of the population. There is a need to increase electricity generation capacity by five times, from 160,000 MW to 800,000 MW by 2031, if the country is to provide ‘electricity to all’. So far, energy, with a heavy reliance on fossil fuels, has been at the core of our development process. Three fourths of India’s electricity is generated from coal – a major contributor to global warming. Even as much as two thirds of India’s carbon dioxide emissions come from burning of coal. In addition, the Planning Commission charts the country’s future energy production to come primarily from coal, and the government of India has already approved of 213 new coal power plants over the next 8 years. |
How can Membership of the CCI platform make a difference to what you are doing? To build political will and encourage governments to take action for energy solutions beyond fossil fuels, we need to build a grassroots movement. Our team is putting together a documentary on coal, and a photographic exhibition of coal’s social and environmental costs. Membership to CCI will give us a platform to use these advocacy tools in making people aware about their surroundings, and take action in their daily lives. |
When the ‘Why New Coal’ campaign started to look deeper into the issue, they realized that the following issues make it clear, that making coal the backbone of our economic development will make the country a major contributor to dangerous climate change:
![]() |
![]() |
- We face a climate emergency, and stand to be seriously affected by climate change. In such a situation, we must aim at sustainable and equitable development based on low carbon technologies – not coal.
- India has only 30-40 years of extractable coal, which we mine in an extremely unsustainable and unscientific manner. We are also importing close to 12% of our coal.
- Coal comes with massive social costs – serious health hazards, displacement and social unrest, environmental and material and relocation costs and destruction of critical water and land resources. These costs are overlooked while calculating the cost of coal-based electricity, and are the reason why coal is still economically feasible over renewable energy.
- What options do we have? According to experts, the country needs to adopt a path of sustainable energy development, improve energy efficiency and conservation, develop and deploy renewable energy, and modernize and expand the ‘smart’ grid.
![]()
On a mission to make a point, and address these concerns, Switch ON, also initiated the India Climate Ride. Two young cyclists, Vinay Jaju and Huub Dekkers teamed up to ride across India, from Kolkata to New Delhi through Agra and India’s coal belt. The team got people to participate in the climate ride in each city, and met up with officials to get a better understanding of this complex issue. While many officials acknowledged that climate change was a serious threat, they did not see an immediate alternative to coal under the business as usual model of development.
Officials are currently able to take the back-foot on coal and energy issues because there are as yet no holistic studies on the external costs of coal and its inclusion in models of costing.
The ‘Why New Coal’ campaign was an attempt to shake peoples’ sense of complacency about the climate crisis, and highlight the fact that coal is at the core of the issue.
![]() |
Following these insights, organizers Vinay Jaju and Ektha Kothari believe that studies that will make India’s sustainability path clear would include detailed documentation of India’s coal reserves, and the external costs of coal-based electricity. Switch ON – in the pipeline: upcoming outreach programmes are in the form of a documentary film by Ekta Kothari on the climate ride and interviews with various energy experts; a photo-exhibition charting the journey through India’s coal belt; a project to deploy clean energy (with a focus on biomass and biogas) in rural India; and an ongoing youth outreach programme. |
For more information and updates visit: http://switchon.org.in/India/ and www.whynewcoal.com
How Climate Change affects India
Precisely at a time when India is confronted with development imperatives25, we will also be severely impacted by climate change. Like other developing countries, several sections of the Indian populace will not be able to buffer themselves from impacts2,8 of global warming. With close economic ties to natural resources and climate-sensitive sectors such as agriculture, water and forestry, India may face a major threat15, and require serious adaptive capacity to combat climate change. As a developing country, India can little afford the risks and economic backlashes that industrialized nations can. With 27.5% of the population still below the poverty line, reducing vulnerability to the impacts of climate change is essential15.
It is in India’s interest to ensure that the world moves towards a low carbon future. Many studies have underscored the nation’s vulnerability to climate change8. With changes in key climate variables, namely temperature, precipitation and humidity, crucial sectors like agriculture and rural development are likely to be affected in a major way.
Impacts are already being seen in unprecedented heat waves, cyclones, floods, salinisation of the coastline and effects on agriculture, fisheries and health8.
India is home to a third of the world’s poor, and climate change will hit this section of society the hardest. Set to be the most populous nation in the world by 2045, the economic, social and ecological price of climate change will be massive.
The future impacts of climate change, identified by the Government of India’s National Communications (NATCOM) in 2004 include25:
- Decreased snow cover, affecting snow-fed and glacial systems such as the Ganges and Bramhaputra. 70% of the summer flow of the Ganges comes from meltwater
- Erratic monsoon with serious effects on rain-fed agriculture, peninsular rivers, water and power supply
- Drop in wheat production by 4-5 million tones, with even a 1ºC rise in temperature
- Rising sea levels causing displacement along one of the most densely populated coastlines in the world, threatened freshwater sources and mangrove ecosystems
- Increased frequency and intensity of floods. Increased vulnerability of people in coastal, arid and semi-arid zones of the country
- Studies indicate that over 50% of India’s forests are likely to experience shift in forest types, adversely impacting associated biodiversity, regional climate dynamics as well as livelihoods based on forest products.
India stands to lose on too many counts to allow a ‘climate-politics-as-usual’ scenario. Therefore, positive engagement with global climate negotiations at the next UNFCCC meeting in December 2009 is crucial8.
India’s accelerating emissions
Although not an emitter historically, India currently has one of the fastest growing economies in the world. With a government target of 8% GDP to achieve developmental priorities16, a share of one sixth of the global population, and changing consumption patterns, India’s emissions are set to increase dramatically.
Growing at an almost breakneck pace, and guzzling coal, gas and oil in large quantities4, we are today, the fourth largest emitter of greenhouse gases worldwide. Although our per-capita emissions are among the lowest in the world, our growth rates imply that the past is no predictor of the future8. The most recent IPCC report suggests that India will experience the greatest increase in energy and greenhouse gas emissions in the world if it sustains a high annual economic growth rate. The International energy Agency predicts that India will become the third largest emitter of greenhouse gases by as early as 2015.
India imports large quantities of fossil fuels to meet its energy needs, and the burning of fossil fuels alone accounts for 83% of India’s carbon dioxide emissions. Nearly 70% of our electricity supply comes from coal.

Although India has maintained its clear economic and social development imperatives, the government recognizes that climate change is an serious problem, and that business as usual is no longer the way forward.
India on climate change
India has committed to actively engage in multilateral negotiations in the UNFCCC, in a ‘positive and forward-looking manner’15. The government recognizes that ‘global warming will affect us seriously’ but maintains that the ‘most important adaptation measure to climate change is development itself’8. This has ensured that India’s position at the UNFCC has stubbornly remained ‘common but differentiated responsibility’. Under the UNFCCC agreement itself, India is not subject to any binding emission reduction targets until the year 2012.
In spite of this guarded stand, India has ‘declared’ that even as it pursues its social and development objectives, it will not allow its per capita emissions to exceed those of developed countries. The 11th 5-year plan does make headway in reducing energy intensity per unit of GHG by 20 percent while boosting cleaner and renewable energy8.
In June 2008, the Prime minister released the much awaited National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC). The NAPCC outlines a strategy by which India will adapt to climate change, while maintaining a high growth rate, protecting poor and vulnerable sections of society and achieving national growth objectives11. It focuses on eight areas intended to deliver maximal benefits to development and climate change (mitigation and adaptation). However, detailed action plans for each mission, and any clear targets are missing from the report8.
Although the action plan may be a missed opportunity for leadership on climate change, the good news is that change is coming8. Realising that the market is changing, and not to be left behind in the global race, Indian businesses are beginning to take on climate change as a business issue.
What we need now is for the government of India to capitalize on India’s position as a developing giant, take the lead and engage with governments of the world and the private sector for a low-carbon future.
References
- IPCC report 2007
- Stern Review
- Design to Win
- Imagining India: Nandan Nilekani
- nasa.gov
- Earth Policy Insitute
- International Energy Agency
- Malini Mehra. India Starts to take on Climate Change.
- Public information bureau
- envfor.nic.in
- Pew Environment Trust
- United Nations
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
- The Nature Conservancy
- National Action Plan on Climate Change
- Sharma S., Bhattacharya S. and A. Garg. Greenhouse gas emissions from India: a
perspective. Current Science Vol 90, No. 3, p 326-333. - KMPG report
- Climate 101: Pew centre report on Climate change
- Nasa Earth observatory report
- Meteorological Office, UK.
- Royal Society
- Jacob Rukvitz; 2008; Climate entrepreneurs, GlobalFOCUS
- State of the World report 2009
- The Road to Copenhagen: India’s position on climate change issues
- Climate Change and India: Impacts, Policy Responses and a Framework for EU-India Cooperation. 2008. Policy Department Economic and Scientific Policy, European Parliament
Global Action

source: unfccc.int
1988: A leading climate scientist James Hansen’s research findings coincided with those of other scientists around the world – the Earth’s climate was changing because of humans. The level of CO2 in the atmosphere had reached 350 ppm, and news and media coverage of global warming shot up following record heat and drought conditions.
This was also the year that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established.
The threat of climate change was real and here to stay. Within months, when heads of state met in Rio De Janeiro in 1992, they adopted the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change – UNFCCC, to consider steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, mainly through international agreement.
Each year since 1995, the UNFCCC has held a ‘Conference of Parties’ (COP) to negotiate and decide on mechanisms to reduce global emissions, mitigate climate change and adapt to it. In 1997, deliberations for concrete action led to the negotiation of the legally binding Kyoto Protocol. As the world approached the new century, there were indications that some progress was being made to tackle the biggest problem humanity had created and would face.
This was not to be. Vested fossil-fuel interests and oil lobbies mobilized a counter-attack23, successfully creating confusion about the facts and pressurizing governments (particularly the United States) to deny the facts and reject the climate change issue.
In a historic diplomatic failure, the United States, under the George W Bush administration refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol, leaving other major industrialized countries shocked.
After nearly ten years of see-sawing negotiations, on 16th February 2005, the Kyoto Protocol became legally binding. But precious time and political momentum had been lost 23. The tragedy of these diplomatic failures has been a serious worsening of the situation. Global emissions are now at 480 ppm, driven by a world economy that runs on oil and coal. Coupled with tropical deforestation, these accelerating emissions have resulted in an alarming rate of increase in carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere 24.
The United States is now the only country that has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol, although it is the second largest contributor of greenhouse gases in the world. Although historical emissions came mostly from industrialized countries, developing countries, not to be outdone, now contribute a large and growing proportion of global emissions.
Non-binding targets on major emitters such as China and India also mean that climate negotiations had led to a impasse between the ‘North’ and the ‘South’.
Over the past few years, owing to a stronger scientific consensus and rising public awareness, the political will to tackle the climate crisis has grown. The EU has made commitments to reduce emissions by 20% below 1990 levels by 2030, and to more cuts if a favourable international agreement is reached in 2009. A new Australian Government ratified the Kyoto Protocol in 2007, and attended the 13th COP, known as the Bali Summit. India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh released India’s National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC). Several states in the US have adopted climate plans, and the Obama administration is all set to take the climate challenge head on.
UNFCCC meetings in 2007 culminated in the Bali Road Map, and an ambitious plan to reach a global long-term agreement that will take over from Kyoto in 2012. This agreement is to be reached at the COP 15 in Copenhagen this year.
Copenhagen: The Crucial Conference
The 15th Conference of Parties of the UNFCCC, to be held in Copenhagen in December 2009, will try to work out a way for the world to work together and agree to a solution to global warming. COP 15 is one of the most significant gatherings ever, as it will be – as many scientists say – the last chance to change, and secure a future for our planet.
Effects on our world
Warming that has already occurred is affecting weather patterns, damaging marine and coastal ecosystems, affecting the Polar Regions and forest ecosystems, and altering crop yields.
Evidence of change: IPCC Report 2007
|
|
For more information see the IPCC report.
Varying degrees of impacts are predicted for varying temperatures. On average, the earth will become warmer. According to the latest IPCC report, even current levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are likely to result in:
Extreme weather events: There are clear indicators that impacts in many sectors will become more and more severe with rising temperatures
Declining crop yields: which could leave millions without the ability to produce or purchase food
Ocean acidification: would affect not just marine systems, but also fish stocks – an already over-extracted resource
Melting glaciers: and rising seas will displace people, submerge cities and lead to salinity of precious arable land. Melting ice sheets are predicted to raise sea levels and threaten at least 4 million km2 of land
Biodiversity loss: changing climate affects species, ecosystems and ecosystem functions. Some ecosystems are more vulnerable to the negative impacts of climate change than others. In fact, some of the most vulnerable ecosystems are also the richest in biodiversity – wetlands, coastal ecosystems and tropical forests.
![]() |
Effects would include severe threat to our food and water security, increased droughts, floods, hurricanes and storms, displacement of coastal populations, increased and changed patterns of diseases2.
To prevent even more drastic changes from occurring, we need to stabilize the level of greenhouse gases at a maximum of 550 ppm (although scientists suggest ideal levels of around 350 ppm).
To achieve this will require urgent, substantial action from both developed and developing countries. For a start, to avoid the most serious consequences, we will have to peak our emissions no later than 2015, and rapidly reduce emissions after that by 50 to 80% below 2000 levels by the year 205018 .
Sources of change
Today however, the realities are rather different. Developing countries, with their larger populations than industrialized ones, have entered into the intensive stages of economic development, and are adding to global emissions. To provide a comparison, between 1990 and 2008, carbon dioxide emissions grew by 27 percent in the US, but by 150 percent in China23.
To get an idea of the pace of development, sample this: the International Energy Agency (IEA) had predicted in 2004, that China would surpass US emissions by 2030. That no longer appears to be true, as China seems to have surpassed US emissions in 2006 – 2007.
All these emissions arise from the burning of fossil fuels for industrialization and development, and through deforestation. Some of the major human activities that result in greenhouse gas emissions are power generation (25%), deforestation (20%), road transport (13%), oil and gas production (6.3%), fertilizer production (6%), livestock (5.1%), cement production (4%), aviation (3.5%), iron and steel manufacture (3.2%) and waste production (3%).
See the pie chart below to see the contribution that the most important greenhouse gases make to global emissions.

Climate Science
The greenhouse effect
Carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases are naturally present in the atmosphere.
These gases trap heat radiated from the earth’s surface. The effect is the warming of the atmosphere and the earth’s surface, and is called the ‘greenhouse effect’

![]() |
Since the industrial revolution, several million tonnes of heat trapping (or greenhouse) gases have been released into the atmosphere, accumulating steadily and trapping more and more heat. Around the start of the industrial revolution, the amount of greenhouse gases (mainly carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide) were a fairly constant 280 parts per million. Today, the overall amount of GHGs has exceeded 430 ppm; more than a 35 percent increase from pre-industrial levels22.
In June 1988, James Hansen, a scientist with NASA, told politicians in the United States that he was almost 99 percent sure that the reason for record high temperatures that year was not from ‘natural variations’, but from the growing concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide.
The Mauna Loa atmospheric measurements (see table below) are the longest continuous record of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations available in the world. Considered to be one of the most favourable locations for measuring carbon dioxide concentrations, the data shows the highest concentrations of carbon dioxide ever to be recorded. Our greenhouse gas emissions have not stopped at the level seen in the graph, but are continuing to increase at the rapid rate of 2.5 ppm each year2 – an alarmingly high rate.
Parallel to the increase in greenhouse gas levels, and as anticipated by scientists2, global mean temperatures have increased. In effect, the earth has warmed by 0.76 ºC since the 1900s2. Each decade, the temperature has increased by about 0.2 ºC.
This time series, from the Climatic Research Unit (source: jpl, NASA), shows the combined global land and sea surface temperatures from 1850 to 2007. The y-axis depicts departures from the long-term average (called ‘temperature anomaly’).

![]() |
|
![]() |
| source: naturalpartiot.org | source: wikipedia | © Kaavya Nag |
Not surprisingly then, all of the ten warmest years on record have occurred since 19902.
|
According to the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO), the top ten warmest years on record have all occurred in the last twelve years. Arctic sea ice was also at a record low level. In September 2007, the Northwest Passage (picture on the right) in the Arctic was ice-free for the first time in satellite record history. (NASA) Scientific evidence and modeling suggests that a 2 ºC rise in average global temperatures represents a ‘tipping point’. Unless the level of greenhouse gases is stabilized, the associated severity of impacts will continue to escalate, and over the next few decades, we would face unavoidable economic and ecological costs2. To prevent the planet from warming to more than this temperature, concentrations of greenhouse gases must not exceed 550 ppm of CO2 equivalent. |
Fast facts on Climate Change
- Overwhelming scientific consensus indicates that human activities are the primary reason for recent climate change1. Over the last century, the burning of fossil fuels has greatly increased the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide2 and other heat-trapping (or greenhouse) gases in the atmosphere.
- Greenhouse gases are at their highest concentration in 650,000 years – climbing from 280 parts per million (ppm) in 1880 to 389 ppm in 20102.
- With this increase in greenhouse gases, average global temperatures have climbed by 0.76° Celsius since 1880. Even if we were to stop emissions today, we are already heading for 1.6°C of warming2.
- Scientists believe that a 2°C rise in global temperatures (and 450 ppm of CO2) by 2100, represents a ‘tipping point’ above which runaway (irreversible) climate change could occur1.
- We are already seeing the effects of warming in Arctic ice is melting, massive ice sheets at the poles have collapsed, sea levels have risen, the ocean is warming and becoming increasingly acidic, trees are flowering earlier. Living systems including coral reefs and polar bears are in decline1.
- More than 100 countries – many being least developed and vulnerable small island states – representing more than 50% of the United Nations’ membership – have called for global carbon dioxide emissions to be limited to 350 ppm – an associated rise of 1.5 ° C by 2100, to ensure their survival.
- The Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), a grouping of 43 of the world’s most vulnerable countries, has called strongly for this 1.5°C stabilization target. These targets are below the 2°C (450 ppm) target promoted by many industrialized countries and some developing countries, which are based on now-outdated science4.
- Recent economic studies show that tighter targets (than 1.5 °C) are feasible, requiring investments of less than 2% of GDP by 2100. Tighter targets would also send a positive carbon price signal to the markets to drive the development of clean energy technologies needed for the transition to low-carbon economies4.
- To avoid dangerous climate change, IPCC projections indicate that world emissions must reach their maximum (peak) by 2015, and start reducing soon after, to avoid dangerous climate change1.
- Recent publications indicate that the consequences of climate change are already occurring at a faster pace and with greater magnitude than the climate models used by the IPCC predict3. Recent observations confirm that sea level rise is in the upper range projected by IPCC models3.
- In South Asia, freshwater availability is predicted to decrease by 2050, and coastal areas will be at risk from increased flooding1.
End Notes
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (2007)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration – Goddard Institute of Space Studies
- Union of Concerned Scientists
- AOSIS press release September 2009
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next Page »











